

A BREAKTHROUGH THEORY
by Dr. Joseph L. Giovannoli, BE, JD

Is Polarization Genetic? (2023) is a revolutionary explanation of why we are so divided on current critical social, economic, and political issues.
Is Polarization Genetic? explains why the United States has become increasingly divided on social and political issues since the 1970s. This third book in a trilogy explains why contrasting liberal and conservative psychological traits evolved as an advantage that gave Stone Age ancestral groups more options for solving problems and competing with other groups. However, an environmental change at the end of the last ice age diminished member collaboration. Without collaboration, once-beneficial differences in members’ conservative and liberal perspectives polarized members into factions, each blind to the wisdom of the other. And to varying degrees, we inherited their liberal and conservative genetic traits.
EVOLUTION OF THE TRILOGY/SYNOPSES
The first book, The Biology of Belief (2000) describes how our brains shape our perceptions and beliefs about reality and how our beliefs are transmitted and acquired. It became recommended reading at eight North American and European universities.
The second book, Seeing Reality As It Is (2019), describes how our inherited brain traits, such as psychological biases, levels of neurotransmitters, and brain circuit variations, referred to as our metaphorical “genetic chaperone,” together with our life experiences, create our individual “circus mirror” versions of reality. In our mirror, each belief, bias, and other inborn trait distorts the mirror as it reflects reality.
The third book, Is Polarization Genetic? (2023) explores why social and political polarization has recently increased in the United States. You might think your reasoning ability shapes your understanding of reality; however, your reasoning relies on your perceptions, which means perception-altering conservative or liberal traits you inherited contribute to shaping your understanding of reality. The book describes an email conversation with Dr. Robin Dunbar of Oxford University, supporting the view that natural selection would have formed our contrasting conservative and liberal genetic perspectives. The book theorizes that an evolutionary mismatch caused our ancestors’ previously beneficial conservative and liberal perceptions to create factions we recognize today as social and political polarization.
The trilogy might change your perspective regarding why you believe as you do, why we all think our personal view of reality is accurate, and that liberal and conservative perspectives evolved genetically making our collaborating ancestors stronger.

THE BIOLOGY OF BELIEF
The Biology of Belief describes the structure and function of the human brain and the influences that shape our beliefs.
This fascinating book is a lucid and readable exploration of our beliefs, drawing on biology, anthropology, psychology, philosophy, and religion to present a relatable explanation of this profound subject. It begins by examining how our brain structures and the workings of our minds influence how our beliefs are created and transmitted. It then explores how our beliefs change, define our realities, determine our actions, alter our perceptions, and perpetuate our cultures. Also explained is why our thought processes are imprecise and subject to manipulation by others without our conscious awareness. The Biology of Belief is a cutting-edge work that can change how we think about ourselves and the world around us.
AI Analysis: Prescience of The Biology of Belief
An AI analysis of “The Biology of Belief” (2001, revised 2023)—based on 1990s research and covering roughly 80–90% of its descriptive psychology, evolutionary discussion, and core conceptual frameworks—finds the work broadly compatible with later science in cognitive psychology, behavioral economics, evolutionary psychology, neuroscience, and cultural studies. Many of the book’s broad ideas anticipated or aligned with major post-2001 developments. These conceptual contributions are presented as one of the book’s strengths. The analysis places the work in the “partly prescient” category, similar to other influential books whose central insights endured (sometimes with refinement) even when early explanations were later updated.
Key prescient observations include:
-
Beliefs shape perception (top-down processing / “apperception”). The book’s central thesis—that we do not passively see reality and that existing beliefs actively alter what we perceive (“believing is seeing”)—anticipated the rise of predictive processing, Bayesian brain theory, and predictive coding frameworks, which are now mainstream in cognitive neuroscience.
-
Culture evolves through transmitted information/beliefs (analogous to biological evolution). An entire chapter (“Where Darwinian Evolution Ends and Belief Evolution Begins”) argues that language enabled beliefs to become units of evolution that spread, compete, and adapt across societies. This prefigured the growth of cultural evolution, cumulative culture, dual inheritance theory, and cultural epidemiology as established interdisciplinary fields.
-
Human reasoning is secondary to intuitive processes. The book repeatedly states that intuition evolved first and that reasoning often serves to justify pre-existing beliefs rather than forming them. This anticipated dual-process theory (System 1/System 2), social intuitionism in moral psychology, and insights from behavioral economics.
-
Emotion often dominates or is integral to reason. The newer reasoning cortex remains subordinate to older emotional circuitry; purely rational decision-making is largely a myth. Later neuroscience strongly reinforced the deep integration of cognition and emotion.
-
Beliefs spread and function like self-organizing, quasi-biological systems. Chapter 4 introduces “Self-organizing Beliefs,” treating them as entities that self-organize, reproduce, and compete. This perspective has parallels in memetics, network science, information diffusion, and complex adaptive systems research.
-
Humans are readily manipulated through cognitive biases. Extensive attention to priming, stereotypes, framing, propaganda, narrative control, and persuasion—well before social media algorithms and misinformation became major topics—anticipated later work on algorithmic persuasion, echo chambers, and persuasive technologies.
-
Childhood beliefs strongly determine adult worldview. Early beliefs form the interpretive framework for later information. This aligns with modern developmental psychology on early schemas, attachment, and predictive models in learning and development.
-
The brain is fundamentally a prediction machine. Intuition is described as unconscious pattern recognition operating before conscious reasoning. This closely resembles contemporary predictive-processing accounts of brain function (terminology differs, but the core idea aligns).
-
Belief systems resist contradictory evidence. Mechanisms such as apperception, belief inertia, “organized ignorance,” and “gatekeepers of belief” preserve existing worldviews. This has anticipated extensive research on confirmation bias, motivated reasoning, belief perseverance, and identity-protective cognition.
-
Society competes primarily through narratives and control of belief. Politics, advertising, religion, and ideology are framed as contests for control of beliefs/narratives rather than solely physical resources (Chapter 12). This anticipated studies of misinformation, information warfare, political polarization, and attention economics—especially relevant after the rise of social media and generative AI.
Particularly forward-looking ideas identified in the analysis:
Perception is prediction filtered through belief (aligns with predictive-processing theories).
Culture evolves through information/beliefs rather than genes alone (anticipated the mainstreaming of cultural evolution research).
Information environments determine societal evolution (written before Facebook, Twitter, smartphones, and generative AI; now highly relevant to digital-age dynamics).
The book’s conceptual framework has generally aged better than some of its proposed specific biological mechanisms. Many central themes (beliefs shape perception, culture/belief evolution, intuition vs. reason, emotion–cognition integration, narrative competition, early belief formation, and resistance to disconfirming evidence) became more prominent or better supported after 2001. The analysis notes a common pattern in influential books: they identify an important phenomenon early, offer a partly correct explanation, and later science retains the core insight while refining or replacing the mechanism.

SEEING REALITY AS IT IS
Seeing Reality As It Is provides a transformational explanation of how and why we perceive reality differently.
This second book in a trilogy draws on biology, anthropology, psychology, philosophy, and religion to present an understandable treatise on this profound and complex subject. The book asks, “If there is one reality, why can't we agree on what it is?” It then describes influences that shape how we perceive reality, dating back to our earliest Stone Age ancestors.
The book introduces the concept of “genetic chaperones,” which are survival-enhancing genetic adaptations passed down from generation to generation. Genetic chaperones include thought-altering neurochemicals, survival-enhancing biases, and variations in our neural circuits. Genetic chaperones cause us to perceive fictitious survival-enhancing versions of reality instead of perceiving reality as it is. And by “hacking” our genetic chaperones, modern propagandists and others manipulate our perceptions and beliefs. By changing how we see ourselves and the world around us, Seeing Reality As It Is makes our social and political conflicts understandable.